Harry R. Lloyd

hrl [at] unc [dot] edu

Home  ●  Research  ●  Presentations  ●  Teaching  ●  Professional Experience  ●  Education  ●  Awards and Grants


Research: Political Philosophy


  • Forthcoming:
     
    • Time discounting defended. Public Affairs Quarterly. [pre-publication pdf]
      • Synopsis: Although almost all other philosophers reject the idea that temporal proximity could matter morally, I argue that this view is more defensible than is commonly supposed
      • Ancestor: Time discounting, consistency, and special obligations: a defence of Robust Temporalism. Global Priorities Institute, working paper no. 11-2021. [pdf | hyperlink | email me for a more recent draft]
      • Won the Oxford Global Priorities Institute's 2021 Essay Prize for Global Priorities Research (£1000)
      • Work influenced:
        • S. J. Beard and Patrick Kaczmarek, 2024. Existential risk, astronomical waste, and the reasonableness of a pure time preference for well-being. Monist, 107.2, 157-75. [open-access pdf | doi]
        • David Thorstad, 2023. Papers I learned from (Part 1: Time discounting, consistency, and special obligations). Reflective Altruism blog post. [hyperlink]
         
  • 2025:
     
    • Disagreement, AI alignment, and bargaining. Philosophical Studies, 182.7, 1757-87 [pre-publication pdf | doi]
      • Synopsis: When stakeholders disagree about how an AI should behave, resolving this disagreement through simulated bargaining is better than resolving it through voting or expected value maximisation
         
    • Gentrification: a philosophical analysis and critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 47.4, 1246-64. [pre-publication pdf | doi]
      • Synopsis: Forms of gentrification that don't displace many land users are still pro tanto morally objectionable insofar as they damage local communities
         
  • 2024:
     
    • Redistribution and selfishness. Analysis, 84.3, 493-503. [pre-publication pdf | doi]
      • Synopsis: Even in a world of completely unselfish people, redistributive taxation would still discourage productive contributions to national wealth